| Title |
Cooperative CO2-to-ethanol conversion via enriched intermediates at molecule–metal catalyst interfaces
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Catalysis, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41929-019-0383-7 |
| Authors |
Fengwang Li, Yuguang C. Li, Ziyun Wang, Jun Li, Dae-Hyun Nam, Yanwei Lum, Mingchuan Luo, Xue Wang, Adnan Ozden, Sung-Fu Hung, Bin Chen, Yuhang Wang, Joshua Wicks, Yi Xu, Yilin Li, Christine M. Gabardo, Cao-Thang Dinh, Ying Wang, Tao-Tao Zhuang, David Sinton, Edward H. Sargent |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 19% |
| Canada | 2 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| Germany | 2 | 10% |
| Portugal | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Belgium | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 52% |
| Scientists | 10 | 48% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 356 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 356 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 88 | 25% |
| Researcher | 37 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 41 | 12% |
| Unknown | 121 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 102 | 29% |
| Chemical Engineering | 45 | 13% |
| Materials Science | 22 | 6% |
| Engineering | 14 | 4% |
| Energy | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 7% |
| Unknown | 139 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,652,147
of 24,988,543 outputs
Outputs from Nature Catalysis
#285
of 907 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,354
of 472,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Catalysis
#21
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,988,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 907 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 472,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.