Title |
Classification of variants of uncertain significance in BRCA1 and BRCA2 using personal and family history of cancer from individuals in a large hereditary cancer multigene panel testing cohort
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genetics in Medicine, December 2019
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41436-019-0729-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hongyan Li, Holly LaDuca, Tina Pesaran, Elizabeth C. Chao, Jill S. Dolinsky, Michael Parsons, Amanda B. Spurdle, Eric C. Polley, Hermela Shimelis, Steven N. Hart, Chunling Hu, Fergus J. Couch, David E. Goldgar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 22% |
Malaysia | 3 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
Taiwan | 1 | 3% |
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 3% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
Mexico | 1 | 3% |
South Africa | 1 | 3% |
Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 12 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 50% |
Scientists | 13 | 41% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
Researcher | 8 | 13% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 19 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 30% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Engineering | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 21 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,815,270
of 25,692,343 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#611
of 2,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,418
of 481,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#23
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,692,343 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 481,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.