RT @PaoloShirasi: "In modern era Great Britain, genetic effects contribute towards some of the observed socioeconomic inequalities." The…
RT @PaoloShirasi: "In modern era Great Britain, genetic effects contribute towards some of the observed socioeconomic inequalities." The…
RT @PaoloShirasi: "In modern era Great Britain, genetic effects contribute towards some of the observed socioeconomic inequalities." The…
RT @PaoloShirasi: "In modern era Great Britain, genetic effects contribute towards some of the observed socioeconomic inequalities." The…
RT @PaoloShirasi: "In modern era Great Britain, genetic effects contribute towards some of the observed socioeconomic inequalities." The…
"In modern era Great Britain, genetic effects contribute towards some of the observed socioeconomic inequalities." The study (using a sample of 286,301 participants from UK Biobank) identified 30 independent-loci associated with income. https://t.co/wh
RT @shunqianjin: 你的收入和遗传相关。此文章分析了28万多英国人,发现人的收入与149个遗传位点的单核苷酸多态型SNP有密切关系 https://t.co/Qt1pDoqwkx
@omarali50 https://t.co/ZpYYpgtzpj but people have gone way way ahead of that.
@ConradkBarwa https://t.co/ZpYYpgtzpj Look at this for example.
你的收入和遗传相关。此文章分析了28万多英国人,发现人的收入与149个遗传位点的单核苷酸多态型SNP有密切关系 https://t.co/Qt1pDoqwkx
kejwhvkjerfhjk Je pleure, en gros il vient d'admettre que si il est pas riche c'est parce qu'il a pas les bons gêne
RT @Mar_Sido: #GWASturbation is my new favorite word
а, вот оно что. опять в Америке научный расизм запрещают, а русские душой болеют очень, переживают за это
@cherryfemdom @yav_zone @Tihiipiket https://t.co/jfRtWjXmbK Говорят, гены, связанные с фичами в коре головного мозга, предсказывают 1.5-2.5% неравенства в доходах
@A2larm Nejen IQ, ale rada dalsich faktoru je dedicna (https://t.co/S3rebDxBoc). Da se predpokladat, ze dite, ktere ma rodice, kteri jsou chytri, nechlastaji, zdrave ji, bude mit podobne vlastnosti nejen z duvodu vychovy, ale i DNA. Zavedeni skolneho tedy
@BenevidesOhana Indeed... Mas já que você começou. Paper do ano de 2019 da era Klingom publicado em revista do grupo Nature correlacionando genes com posição social. Nunca foi retratado. Ficou puta? Então calma que tem coisa pior... https://t.co/qE1csgs
Twitter se dneska rozběsnil kvůli slovu "genofond". Tak si připomeňme, že sociooekonomický status skutečně je geneticky ovlivněn. Tudíž mluvit o genofondu dáva smysl.
RT @clakklaa: This applies to regional wealth, too. My home city of Liverpool has a terrible reputation nationally for poverty and is frequ…
Genome-wide analysis identifies molecular systems and 149 genetic loci associated with income | Nature Communications https://t.co/FCtAJ944a1
big if true #genetics #GeneTherapy #socioeconomics
This applies to regional wealth, too. My home city of Liverpool has a terrible reputation nationally for poverty and is frequently in the top 10 of X horrible things. So what's going on in Liverpool?
如何にもプレジデントオンライン的な「身も蓋もない記事」だけど、ウーム? 収入に対する遺伝の影響が43歳で58.7%とピーク。ただし男性に限る。(女性は遺伝的影響なし) https://t.co/jnRH2vPTg6 Nature関連が元ネタ?これかな? https://t.co/5UMByzxu2l https://t.co/TfWem4Cqjc
RT @jayjoseph22: "We identify 30 (29 previously unreported) independent-loci associated with income...we identify an additional 120 income-…
RT @jayjoseph22: "We identify 30 (29 previously unreported) independent-loci associated with income...we identify an additional 120 income-…
So do you suppose we could eventually selectively breed a population with no poverty? Interesting idea.
Oh brother, another one. So many loci! Income *must* be genetic then.
"We identify 30 (29 previously unreported) independent-loci associated with income...we identify an additional 120 income-associated loci." If Nature published a study finding genes for "household income," it must be true. https://t.co/iIRK3pNrl5 https:
遺伝子の解析によって、年収が高くなるかどうかに関わる遺伝子が30個特定されています。 ゲノム解析論文を50本ほど読めば、とりあえず専門家と自称していいくらいには詳しくなれるはず。よっしゃがんばろ https://t.co/JSXF1lDetr
Genetic analysis identifies molecular systems and biological pathways associated with household income published as: https://t.co/FsL3pxhz5W @naturecomms #biorxiv
There's already a GWAS for income: https://t.co/HJu7LSd7KZ
رابط البحث: https://t.co/c9xxsi0emB الحديث: "إن أحدكم يُجمع خلقه في بطن أمه أربعين يوما نطفةً ، ثم يكون علقةً مثل ذلك ، ثم يكون مضغةً مثل ذلك ، ثم يُرسل إليه الملك فينفخ فيه الروح ، ويُؤمر بأربع كلمات : بكتب رزقه ، وأجله ، وعمله ، وشقي أم سعيد .
@PaoloShirasi Here is the actual study you were quoting: https://t.co/tfX4JURyCw
That this paper hasn't been retracted yet https://t.co/umsGr0arU4
@kalle_leppala @thebirdmaniac It was after this one. https://t.co/tzqeJeS16C
RT @NatureComms: Genome-wide analysis identifies molecular systems and 149 genetic loci associated with income | https://t.co/OynYeLxhMw #…
RT @whyvert: That chart from Hill et al 2019 (open access) https://t.co/LopLtSrOgu
That chart from Hill et al 2019 (open access) https://t.co/LopLtSrOgu
@blair_fix If you're aiming to explain income differences (always tricky since it is such a noisy variable), these days you really cannot ignore genetic studies eg https://t.co/UWI5QWmGEB https://t.co/ZqE8PiC5gh
@ntsnaleatorias O do ano passado, sobre 'impacto negativo das orientadoras mulheres', teve mais repercussão e eles publicaram retratação. Mas o que eu me referia era esse (que é igualmente problemático...) https://t.co/koceadQ7PY
RT @NatureComms: Genome-wide analysis identifies molecular systems and 149 genetic loci associated with income | https://t.co/OynYeLxhMw #…
@CamronBryantPhD @robwilliamsiii "consistently co-inherited" is accurate. But invariably, language of causality is used. One example: "These results indicate that, in modern era Great Britain, genetic effects contribute towards some of the observed soci
@ArtFlyingV Aliás, não precisa nem ir muito longe 😖 https://t.co/qE1csgsKfg
@jayjoseph22 Here's a few more to play with. Genes for religiosity https://t.co/SyEiCItDdC sedentary behaviour (i.e. sitting a lot) https://t.co/CTHv2G3PyZ income differences https://t.co/fK2R1CtwfI
@philipcball The way it’s sold, but not the way it’s done? https://t.co/NbT7ODuZLD
RT @selfcomestomine: 最近の行動遺伝学では、「年収」は環境よりも遺伝子由来だ、ということになってきている。育児に金を注いだから子どもがいい大学に入れていい仕事につけて結婚ができる、というのは違うんじゃないか。 https://t.co/MyL49GHV6Y
RT @selfcomestomine: 最近の行動遺伝学では、「年収」は環境よりも遺伝子由来だ、ということになってきている。育児に金を注いだから子どもがいい大学に入れていい仕事につけて結婚ができる、というのは違うんじゃないか。
RT @selfcomestomine: 最近の行動遺伝学では、「年収」は環境よりも遺伝子由来だ、ということになってきている。育児に金を注いだから子どもがいい大学に入れていい仕事につけて結婚ができる、というのは違うんじゃないか。
RT @selfcomestomine: 最近の行動遺伝学では、「年収」は環境よりも遺伝子由来だ、ということになってきている。育児に金を注いだから子どもがいい大学に入れていい仕事につけて結婚ができる、というのは違うんじゃないか。
RT @yuji_ikegaya: 【年収は遺伝する】高収入に関与する遺伝子を約29万人からゲノム探索したところ、149個の遺伝子座が見つかりました。主に大脳皮質で働き、知能レベルとの関連が推測されるそうです。先週の『ネイチャー通信』誌→ https://t.co/sN8a6P…
RT @selfcomestomine: 最近の行動遺伝学では、「年収」は環境よりも遺伝子由来だ、ということになってきている。育児に金を注いだから子どもがいい大学に入れていい仕事につけて結婚ができる、というのは違うんじゃないか。 https://t.co/MyL49GHV6Y
RT @selfcomestomine: 最近の行動遺伝学では、「年収」は環境よりも遺伝子由来だ、ということになってきている。育児に金を注いだから子どもがいい大学に入れていい仕事につけて結婚ができる、というのは違うんじゃないか。 https://t.co/MyL49GHV6Y
RT @selfcomestomine: 最近の行動遺伝学では、「年収」は環境よりも遺伝子由来だ、ということになってきている。育児に金を注いだから子どもがいい大学に入れていい仕事につけて結婚ができる、というのは違うんじゃないか。 https://t.co/MyL49GHV6Y
最近の行動遺伝学では、「年収」は環境よりも遺伝子由来だ、ということになってきている。育児に金を注いだから子どもがいい大学に入れていい仕事につけて結婚ができる、というのは違うんじゃないか。
It is surprising that THIS was even published! (probably explains why we scientists are paid so less?! lol) "we identify intelligence as one of the likely causal psychological traits partly driving differences in income..." https://t.co/qRjO1JW31w
A 2019 study. 149 genetic loci associated with income. Socioeconomic status has genetic links, primarily through intelligence, but could be modified by environmental factors and rate EDUCATION as a top priority to bridge the gap. https://t.co/5oUChqhyv2 h
@marc_rr @ZachWeiner too bad the book it's based on is written by an author who also co-wrote this paper: https://t.co/NbT7ODdoU5
@JamesLingford is it any surprise Ian Deary went on to publish this? sadly in a more widely read journal too.. https://t.co/NbT7ODdoU5
@pastramimachine All 149 of them. https://t.co/NbT7ODuZLD
@Mrjjrocks @rasmansa Lifetime income is not an accurate measure given its auto-correlation with entry wages and education. In your reference, it is shown that the effect net of education is trivial. Twin studies estimates are not reliable measures of h2.
RT @BrainMendels: Excellent article linking genetics and income https://t.co/yZVqYir3lt. Data is from UK biobank, and it shows that genetic…
Good use of the Biobank 🤔 https://t.co/IgPTwn5c9S
Sadly genes matter. What this means isn't "OMG YOUR EVIL FOR RETWEETING THIS" it means, be careful who you have sex with. Sex smart people and in a few generations the population will be smarter.
I am not an expert in mol bio, nor do I know the two teams. But still retweeting it. I want people who address systemic racism to also address the problem of geographical underrepresentation and inherent bias that the global south faces, and how discrimin
This paper is eugenics.
RT @schneiderleonid: Bunch of white psychologists solved century-old issues. There is no such thing as class privilege, racism, nepotism, s…
RT @a_succurro: @drdevangm @NatureComms You are totally right - the coverage was not comparable, but I clearly remembered conversations abo…
who gave this paper a pass? I recall it being immediately trashed when it came out 900 years ago?
RT @nandita_j: Another @NatureComms paper from Dec 2019.
RT @schneiderleonid: Bunch of white psychologists solved century-old issues. There is no such thing as class privilege, racism, nepotism, s…
RT @jeremymberg: This paper reminds me of Nobelist Michael Brown's question to med students about how to create a genetic disease. His answ…
@Grandpa_Hiro @SuayibUestuen How about a GWAS paper while we’re at it? Some people must think are genetic factors (or molecular systems) for why people don’t get cited.... 🤮 https://t.co/GMHCBflyF3
RT @schneiderleonid: Bunch of white psychologists solved century-old issues. There is no such thing as class privilege, racism, nepotism, s…
RT @topquark_sharma: How can @NatureComms allow such papers I mean RIDICULOUS. https://t.co/nbG09NUHd6
How can @NatureComms allow such papers I mean RIDICULOUS.
RT @schneiderleonid: Bunch of white psychologists solved century-old issues. There is no such thing as class privilege, racism, nepotism, s…
RT @david_swofford: I've been spending too much time on Twitter and I know it but it's always a love-hate relationship. I love Twitter bec…
I've been spending too much time on Twitter and I know it but it's always a love-hate relationship. I love Twitter because I would have not known about this paper otherwise. I hate Twitter because my life would have been just fine never knowing about it.
RT @drdevangm: You know what's hypocritical? Trashing the @NatureComms paper authored by people in Abu Dhabi but giving this equally bad @N…
RT @drdevangm: You know what's hypocritical? Trashing the @NatureComms paper authored by people in Abu Dhabi but giving this equally bad @N…
RT @drdevangm: You know what's hypocritical? Trashing the @NatureComms paper authored by people in Abu Dhabi but giving this equally bad @N…
RT @jeremymberg: This paper reminds me of Nobelist Michael Brown's question to med students about how to create a genetic disease. His answ…
RT @drdevangm: You know what's hypocritical? Trashing the @NatureComms paper authored by people in Abu Dhabi but giving this equally bad @N…
RT @schneiderleonid: Bunch of white psychologists solved century-old issues. There is no such thing as class privilege, racism, nepotism, s…
RT @ChrisWWheat: in case you forgot some of the other recent crap @NatureComms has published ... seriously, WTF. Editors at NatComm ... you…
RT @jeremymberg: This paper reminds me of Nobelist Michael Brown's question to med students about how to create a genetic disease. His answ…
RT @jeremymberg: This paper reminds me of Nobelist Michael Brown's question to med students about how to create a genetic disease. His answ…
@akshaysurendr @thewoodowl @4thewildtiger
RT @drdevangm: You know what's hypocritical? Trashing the @NatureComms paper authored by people in Abu Dhabi but giving this equally bad @N…
RT @nandita_j: Another @NatureComms paper from Dec 2019. https://t.co/ZTYmBudk5H
RT @jeremymberg: This paper reminds me of Nobelist Michael Brown's question to med students about how to create a genetic disease. His answ…
RT @drdevangm: You know what's hypocritical? Trashing the @NatureComms paper authored by people in Abu Dhabi but giving this equally bad @N…
RT @ptheodoni: In the Science news today 1 If you want to be successful in science choose a male mentor https://t.co/ZejZakaSgW 2 If you ar…
RT @drdevangm: You know what's hypocritical? Trashing the @NatureComms paper authored by people in Abu Dhabi but giving this equally bad @N…
RT @jeremymberg: This paper reminds me of Nobelist Michael Brown's question to med students about how to create a genetic disease. His answ…
I have no clue where any of the authors are on these papers...but this paper is bad too
RT @drdevangm: You know what's hypocritical? Trashing the @NatureComms paper authored by people in Abu Dhabi but giving this equally bad @N…
Another @NatureComms paper from Dec 2019.
Did not know about this but I'm glad I do now. While rightly rebutting this latest paper, it will also be good to take a step back and recognise the broader issue and many others we may have let go too easily.
RT @schneiderleonid: Bunch of white psychologists solved century-old issues. There is no such thing as class privilege, racism, nepotism, s…