↓ Skip to main content

Erratum: Corrigendum: Telomeres shorten at equivalent rates in somatic tissues of adults

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Erratum: Corrigendum: Telomeres shorten at equivalent rates in somatic tissues of adults
Published in
Nature Communications, July 2013
DOI 10.1038/ncomms2976
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lily Daniali, Athanase Benetos, Ezra Susser, Jeremy D. Kark, Carlos Labat, Masayuki Kimura, Kunj K. Desai, Mark Granick, Abraham Aviv

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 67%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 67%
Neuroscience 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,603,127
of 23,182,015 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#37,521
of 47,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,544
of 199,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#243
of 364 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,182,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47,871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 364 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.