↓ Skip to main content

Integrated exome and RNA sequencing of dedifferentiated liposarcoma

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Integrated exome and RNA sequencing of dedifferentiated liposarcoma
Published in
Nature Communications, December 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-13286-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Makoto Hirata, Naofumi Asano, Kotoe Katayama, Akihiko Yoshida, Yusuke Tsuda, Masaya Sekimizu, Sachiyo Mitani, Eisuke Kobayashi, Motokiyo Komiyama, Hiroyuki Fujimoto, Takahiro Goto, Yukihide Iwamoto, Norifumi Naka, Shintaro Iwata, Yoshihiro Nishida, Toru Hiruma, Hiroaki Hiraga, Hirotaka Kawano, Toru Motoi, Yoshinao Oda, Daisuke Matsubara, Masashi Fujita, Tatsuhiro Shibata, Hidewaki Nakagawa, Robert Nakayama, Tadashi Kondo, Seiya Imoto, Satoru Miyano, Akira Kawai, Rui Yamaguchi, Hitoshi Ichikawa, Koichi Matsuda

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Student > Master 5 9%
Lecturer 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 20 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 21 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2019.
All research outputs
#6,405,518
of 23,182,015 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#35,236
of 47,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,497
of 459,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1,082
of 1,399 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,182,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.0. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,399 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.