↓ Skip to main content

Maternal immune activation by poly(I:C) induces expression of cytokines IL-1β and IL-13, chemokine MCP-1 and colony stimulating factor VEGF in fetal mouse brain

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroinflammation, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
231 Mendeley
Title
Maternal immune activation by poly(I:C) induces expression of cytokines IL-1β and IL-13, chemokine MCP-1 and colony stimulating factor VEGF in fetal mouse brain
Published in
Journal of Neuroinflammation, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1742-2094-9-83
Pubmed ID
Authors

Géraldine Arrode-Brusés, Juan L Brusés

Abstract

Maternal viral infection during pregnancy is associated with an increase in the incidence of psychiatric disorders with presumed neurodevelopmental origin, including autism spectrum disorders and schizophrenia. The enhanced risk for developing mental illness appears to be caused by deleterious effects of innate immune response-associated factors on the development of the central nervous system, which predispose the offspring to pathological behaviors in adolescence and adulthood. To identify the immune response-associated soluble factors that may affect central nervous system development, we examined the effect of innate immune response activation by polyriboinosinic-polyribocytidylic acid (poly(I:C)), a synthetic analogue of viral double-stranded RNA, on the expression levels of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines and colony stimulating factors in fetal and postnatal mouse brain 6 h and 24 h after treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Unknown 222 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 23%
Researcher 30 13%
Student > Master 29 13%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 9%
Other 37 16%
Unknown 36 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 20%
Neuroscience 42 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 7%
Psychology 15 6%
Other 28 12%
Unknown 43 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2023.
All research outputs
#20,166,456
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#2,257
of 2,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,252
of 175,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#30
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.