| Title |
Chinese herbal medicine for patients living with HIV in Guangxi province, China: an analysis of two registries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-53725-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jin Sun, Feng Jiang, Bin Wen, Zhen-wei Liu, Mei Han, Nicola Robinson, Nuala McGrath, Yu-tong Fei, Ying Zhang, Jing Li, Wen-yuan Li, Xin Deng, Jian-Ping Liu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 23% |
| Unknown | 9 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 14% |
| Psychology | 3 | 14% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2024.
All research outputs
#6,507,553
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#44,647
of 140,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,908
of 474,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,338
of 4,134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 140,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.