| Title |
Detecting contamination in viromes using ViromeQC
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Biotechnology, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41587-019-0334-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Moreno Zolfo, Federica Pinto, Francesco Asnicar, Paolo Manghi, Adrian Tett, Frederic D. Bushman, Nicola Segata |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 19% |
| Italy | 8 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 8% |
| Japan | 4 | 5% |
| Germany | 3 | 4% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 21% |
| Unknown | 20 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 49% |
| Scientists | 42 | 49% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 109 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 24 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 23% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 12 | 11% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 31 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2023.
All research outputs
#745,176
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#1,501
of 8,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,618
of 477,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#44
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,601 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 477,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.