↓ Skip to main content

Selective cortical representation of attended speaker in multi-talker speech perception

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
45 X users
patent
8 patents
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
779 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1188 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
Title
Selective cortical representation of attended speaker in multi-talker speech perception
Published in
Nature, April 2012
DOI 10.1038/nature11020
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nima Mesgarani, Edward F. Chang

Abstract

Humans possess a remarkable ability to attend to a single speaker's voice in a multi-talker background. How the auditory system manages to extract intelligible speech under such acoustically complex and adverse listening conditions is not known, and, indeed, it is not clear how attended speech is internally represented. Here, using multi-electrode surface recordings from the cortex of subjects engaged in a listening task with two simultaneous speakers, we demonstrate that population responses in non-primary human auditory cortex encode critical features of attended speech: speech spectrograms reconstructed based on cortical responses to the mixture of speakers reveal the salient spectral and temporal features of the attended speaker, as if subjects were listening to that speaker alone. A simple classifier trained solely on examples of single speakers can decode both attended words and speaker identity. We find that task performance is well predicted by a rapid increase in attention-modulated neural selectivity across both single-electrode and population-level cortical responses. These findings demonstrate that the cortical representation of speech does not merely reflect the external acoustic environment, but instead gives rise to the perceptual aspects relevant for the listener's intended goal.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 45 4%
Germany 11 <1%
United Kingdom 11 <1%
Netherlands 6 <1%
France 6 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
Belgium 4 <1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Other 19 2%
Unknown 1075 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 322 27%
Researcher 238 20%
Student > Master 100 8%
Student > Bachelor 85 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 64 5%
Other 224 19%
Unknown 155 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 197 17%
Psychology 197 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 184 15%
Engineering 137 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 72 6%
Other 178 15%
Unknown 223 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 202. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#197,556
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#11,784
of 99,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#783
of 178,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#66
of 1,023 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,023 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.