| Title |
Soil carbon science for policy and practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Sustainability, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41893-019-0431-y |
| Authors |
Mark A. Bradford, Chelsea J. Carey, Lesley Atwood, Deborah Bossio, Eli P. Fenichel, Sasha Gennet, Joseph Fargione, Jonathan R. B. Fisher, Emma Fuller, Daniel A. Kane, Johannes Lehmann, Emily E. Oldfield, Elsa M. Ordway, Joseph Rudek, Jonathan Sanderman, Stephen A. Wood |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 17% |
| Finland | 7 | 10% |
| Australia | 6 | 9% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Greece | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 26 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 49 | 71% |
| Scientists | 18 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 272 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 59 | 22% |
| Researcher | 56 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 45 | 17% |
| Unknown | 64 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 64 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 59 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 8% |
| Unknown | 99 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 146. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2023.
All research outputs
#287,365
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Sustainability
#271
of 1,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,203
of 378,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Sustainability
#15
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,169 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 125.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.