| Title |
Identity domains capture individual differences from across the behavioral repertoire
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Neuroscience, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41593-019-0516-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Oren Forkosh, Stoyo Karamihalev, Simone Roeh, Uri Alon, Sergey Anpilov, Chadi Touma, Markus Nussbaumer, Cornelia Flachskamm, Paul M. Kaplick, Yair Shemesh, Alon Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 97 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 19% |
| Germany | 8 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 6% |
| Israel | 4 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 33 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 57 | 59% |
| Scientists | 34 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 271 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 65 | 24% |
| Researcher | 31 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 40 | 15% |
| Unknown | 65 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 90 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 16% |
| Psychology | 11 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 35 | 13% |
| Unknown | 76 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 116. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2021.
All research outputs
#366,515
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#672
of 5,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,216
of 383,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#23
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.