↓ Skip to main content

Numerical Simulations of MitraClip Placement: Clinical Implications

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Numerical Simulations of MitraClip Placement: Clinical Implications
Published in
Scientific Reports, November 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-52342-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ramji Kamakoti, Yaghoub Dabiri, Dee Dee Wang, Julius Guccione, Ghassan S. Kassab

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 12 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 10 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Computer Science 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 16 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,477,144
of 23,508,125 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#50,807
of 127,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,375
of 364,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,727
of 4,121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,508,125 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 127,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.