| Title |
High-performance chemical- and light-inducible recombinases in mammalian cells and mice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-12800-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Benjamin H. Weinberg, Jang Hwan Cho, Yash Agarwal, N. T. Hang Pham, Leidy D. Caraballo, Maciej Walkosz, Charina Ortega, Micaela Trexler, Nathan Tague, Billy Law, William K. J. Benman, Justin Letendre, Jacob Beal, Wilson W. Wong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 29% |
| Germany | 2 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| France | 2 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| China | 1 | 4% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 54% |
| Scientists | 10 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 132 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 18% |
| Researcher | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 38 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 45 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 10% |
| Engineering | 10 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 38 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,876,857
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#25,248
of 58,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,841
of 375,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#700
of 1,486 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,486 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.