| Title |
Scalable and sustainable electrochemical allylic C–H oxidation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature17431 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Evan J. Horn, Brandon R. Rosen, Yong Chen, Jiaze Tang, Ke Chen, Martin D. Eastgate, Phil S. Baran |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 12% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 60% |
| Scientists | 10 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 603 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 595 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 148 | 25% |
| Researcher | 83 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 68 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 57 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 38 | 6% |
| Other | 89 | 15% |
| Unknown | 120 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 385 | 64% |
| Chemical Engineering | 15 | 2% |
| Engineering | 15 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 27 | 4% |
| Unknown | 141 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 178. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2024.
All research outputs
#226,509
of 25,416,581 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#13,161
of 97,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,112
of 313,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#309
of 991 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,416,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97,903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 991 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.