| Title |
Yeasts and how they came to be
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Microbiology, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41579-019-0274-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sara Calhoun, Stephen J. Mondo, Igor V. Grigoriev |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 8% |
| France | 4 | 6% |
| Germany | 3 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Sweden | 2 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Hungary | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 35 | 56% |
| Members of the public | 27 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 20% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 13% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,190,503
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Microbiology
#554
of 2,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,361
of 358,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Microbiology
#13
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.