| Title |
Functional organization of motor networks in the lumbosacral spinal cord of non-human primates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-49328-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amirali Toossi, Dirk G. Everaert, Steve I. Perlmutter, Vivian K. Mushahwar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 30% |
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Germany | 1 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 16% |
| Researcher | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 11 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 14 | 27% |
| Engineering | 8 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Unknown | 11 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2020.
All research outputs
#584,665
of 23,163,378 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#6,520
of 125,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,752
of 343,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#169
of 3,378 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,163,378 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,378 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.