↓ Skip to main content

Stunted microbiota and opportunistic pathogen colonization in caesarean-section birth

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
631 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1051 Mendeley
Title
Stunted microbiota and opportunistic pathogen colonization in caesarean-section birth
Published in
Nature, September 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1560-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yan Shao, Samuel C. Forster, Evdokia Tsaliki, Kevin Vervier, Angela Strang, Nandi Simpson, Nitin Kumar, Mark D. Stares, Alison Rodger, Peter Brocklehurst, Nigel Field, Trevor D. Lawley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 857 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,051 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1051 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 169 16%
Researcher 140 13%
Student > Bachelor 137 13%
Student > Master 98 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 46 4%
Other 123 12%
Unknown 338 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 165 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 131 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 105 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 102 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 45 4%
Other 124 12%
Unknown 379 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1925. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,970
of 25,582,611 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#531
of 98,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75
of 353,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#14
of 977 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,582,611 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 977 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.