| Title |
Dental erosion in a group of British 14-year-old school children Part II: Influence of dietary intake
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Dental Journal, March 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1038/sj.bdj.4800943 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Y H Al-Dlaigan, L Shaw, A Smith |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 24% |
| Unknown | 10 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 47% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2019.
All research outputs
#764,341
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from British Dental Journal
#92
of 6,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#436
of 40,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Dental Journal
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,084 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.