| Title |
Strategies to reduce diagnostic errors: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12911-019-0901-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie Abimanyi-Ochom, Shalika Bohingamu Mudiyanselage, Max Catchpool, Marnie Firipis, Sithara Wanni Arachchige Dona, Jennifer J. Watts |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 22% |
| Australia | 3 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 57% |
| Scientists | 5 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 119 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 31 | 26% |
| Unknown | 37 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 44 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,501,315
of 23,306,612 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#175
of 2,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,345
of 340,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#4
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,306,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,024 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.