| Title |
Hidden diversity of vacancy networks in Prussian blue analogues
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-020-1980-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arkadiy Simonov, Trees De Baerdemaeker, Hanna L. B. Boström, María Laura Ríos Gómez, Harry J. Gray, Dmitry Chernyshov, Alexey Bosak, Hans-Beat Bürgi, Andrew L. Goodwin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 16% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 47% |
| Scientists | 13 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 175 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 19% |
| Researcher | 31 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Unknown | 58 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 42 | 24% |
| Materials Science | 30 | 17% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 11 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Chemical Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 67 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,279,966
of 24,829,155 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#35,406
of 95,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,280
of 468,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#688
of 925 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,829,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 95,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 468,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 925 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.