| Title |
Brief oxygenation events in locally anoxic oceans during the Cambrian solves the animal breathing paradox
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-48123-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tais W. Dahl, Marie-Louise Siggaard-Andersen, Niels H. Schovsbo, Daniel O. Persson, Søren Husted, Iben W. Hougård, Alexander J. Dickson, Kurt Kjær, Arne T. Nielsen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 23% |
| Denmark | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 85% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 21% |
| Unknown | 14 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 28 | 58% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,349,976
of 24,359,979 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#13,043
of 132,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,088
of 346,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#357
of 3,443 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,359,979 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 132,524 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,443 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.