↓ Skip to main content

Brief oxygenation events in locally anoxic oceans during the Cambrian solves the animal breathing paradox

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
10 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Brief oxygenation events in locally anoxic oceans during the Cambrian solves the animal breathing paradox
Published in
Scientific Reports, August 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-48123-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tais W. Dahl, Marie-Louise Siggaard-Andersen, Niels H. Schovsbo, Daniel O. Persson, Søren Husted, Iben W. Hougård, Alexander J. Dickson, Kurt Kjær, Arne T. Nielsen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 15%
Other 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 17 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 28 53%
Unspecified 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Decision Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 20 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,605,356
of 26,096,076 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#15,230
of 144,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,467
of 357,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#393
of 3,483 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,096,076 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 144,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,483 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.