↓ Skip to main content

Brief oxygenation events in locally anoxic oceans during the Cambrian solves the animal breathing paradox

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Brief oxygenation events in locally anoxic oceans during the Cambrian solves the animal breathing paradox
Published in
Scientific Reports, August 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-48123-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tais W. Dahl, Marie-Louise Siggaard-Andersen, Niels H. Schovsbo, Daniel O. Persson, Søren Husted, Iben W. Hougård, Alexander J. Dickson, Kurt Kjær, Arne T. Nielsen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Other 4 11%
Unspecified 3 8%
Other 10 27%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 23 62%
Unspecified 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Decision Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,102,700
of 17,583,573 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#17,895
of 94,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,332
of 269,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,583,573 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94,738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them