↓ Skip to main content

Digitally encoded DNA nanostructures for multiplexed, single-molecule protein sensing with nanopores

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Nanotechnology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
36 X users
patent
16 patents
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
269 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
329 Mendeley
Title
Digitally encoded DNA nanostructures for multiplexed, single-molecule protein sensing with nanopores
Published in
Nature Nanotechnology, April 2016
DOI 10.1038/nnano.2016.50
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas A. W. Bell, Ulrich F. Keyser

Abstract

The simultaneous detection of a large number of different analytes is important in bionanotechnology research and in diagnostic applications. Nanopore sensing is an attractive method in this regard as the approach can be integrated into small, portable device architectures, and there is significant potential for detecting multiple sub-populations in a sample. Here, we show that highly multiplexed sensing of single molecules can be achieved with solid-state nanopores by using digitally encoded DNA nanostructures. Based on the principles of DNA origami, we designed a library of DNA nanostructures in which each member contains a unique barcode; each bit in the barcode is signalled by the presence or absence of multiple DNA dumbbell hairpins. We show that a 3-bit barcode can be assigned with 94% accuracy by electrophoretically driving the DNA structures through a solid-state nanopore. Select members of the library were then functionalized to detect a single, specific antibody through antigen presentation at designed positions on the DNA. This allows us to simultaneously detect four different antibodies of the same isotype at nanomolar concentration levels.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 329 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 322 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 97 29%
Student > Master 42 13%
Researcher 31 9%
Student > Bachelor 23 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 5%
Other 45 14%
Unknown 75 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 69 21%
Engineering 47 14%
Physics and Astronomy 42 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 9%
Other 30 9%
Unknown 83 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2023.
All research outputs
#839,508
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Nature Nanotechnology
#801
of 3,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,712
of 315,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Nanotechnology
#16
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.