↓ Skip to main content

2Q19—Biotech funding stagnates

Overview of attention for news story in Nature Biotechnology
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
2Q19—Biotech funding stagnates
Published by
Nature Biotechnology, August 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41587-019-0216-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura DeFrancesco

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 33%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2019.
All research outputs
#8,810,798
of 15,606,530 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#6,130
of 7,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,230
of 262,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#86
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,606,530 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,071 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.3. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.