↓ Skip to main content

Endothelial tip cells in vitro are less glycolytic and have a more flexible response to metabolic stress than non-tip cells

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Endothelial tip cells in vitro are less glycolytic and have a more flexible response to metabolic stress than non-tip cells
Published in
Scientific Reports, July 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-46503-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. Yetkin-Arik, I. M. C. Vogels, N. Neyazi, V. van Duinen, R. H. Houtkooper, C. J. F. van Noorden, I. Klaassen, R. O. Schlingemann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 17%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Unspecified 4 4%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 33 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Unspecified 4 4%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 33 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2019.
All research outputs
#5,604,248
of 23,152,542 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#38,202
of 125,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,558
of 347,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,084
of 3,340 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,152,542 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,181 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,340 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.