↓ Skip to main content

Topologically correct central projections of tetrapod inner ear afferents require Fzd3

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Topologically correct central projections of tetrapod inner ear afferents require Fzd3
Published in
Scientific Reports, July 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-46553-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeremy S. Duncan, Bernd Fritzsch, Douglas W. Houston, Elizabeth M. Ketchum, Jennifer Kersigo, Michael R. Deans, Karen L. Elliott

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 31%
Researcher 2 15%
Professor 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 4 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Other 2 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2021.
All research outputs
#10,727,958
of 18,707,006 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#47,626
of 100,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,830
of 271,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,707,006 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.