| Title |
Fossil evidence of core monocots in the Early Cretaceous
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Plants, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41477-019-0468-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Clément Coiffard, Nikolay Kardjilov, Ingo Manke, Mary E. C. Bernardes-de-Oliveira |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 11% |
| Japan | 8 | 10% |
| United States | 5 | 6% |
| Argentina | 3 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Peru | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 41 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 62 | 78% |
| Scientists | 14 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 15% |
| Professor | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 11% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Other | 13 | 28% |
| Unknown | 6 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 38% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 132. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2023.
All research outputs
#319,574
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from Nature Plants
#161
of 2,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,338
of 362,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Plants
#7
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.