Title |
Cell type-dependent differential activation of ERK by oncogenic KRAS in colon cancer and intestinal epithelium
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Communications, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-10954-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Raphael Brandt, Thomas Sell, Mareen Lüthen, Florian Uhlitz, Bertram Klinger, Pamela Riemer, Claudia Giesecke-Thiel, Silvia Schulze, Ismail Amr El-Shimy, Desiree Kunkel, Beatrix Fauler, Thorsten Mielke, Norbert Mages, Bernhard G. Herrmann, Christine Sers, Nils Blüthgen, Markus Morkel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 26% |
Germany | 5 | 16% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
Spain | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
France | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Portugal | 1 | 3% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 6 | 19% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 52% |
Scientists | 13 | 42% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 151 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 28% |
Researcher | 20 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
Student > Master | 10 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
Other | 23 | 15% |
Unknown | 35 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 58 | 38% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 10% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 5% |
Engineering | 5 | 3% |
Other | 16 | 11% |
Unknown | 34 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2021.
All research outputs
#854,992
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#14,112
of 48,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,081
of 348,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#385
of 1,417 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 48,119 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,417 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.