| Title |
Calcium contradictions in cilia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature17313 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dominic P. Norris, Peter K. Jackson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 11% |
| Canada | 4 | 9% |
| United States | 3 | 6% |
| Mexico | 2 | 4% |
| Japan | 2 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 27 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 74% |
| Scientists | 9 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 25 | 76% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 25 | 76% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2016.
All research outputs
#1,023,232
of 25,643,886 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#32,339
of 98,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,605
of 315,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#675
of 992 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,643,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 992 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.