| Title |
Making risk-takers settle
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature17314 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nick G. Hollon, Paul E. M. Phillips |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 129 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 24 | 19% |
| Canada | 7 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 4% |
| Japan | 4 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 64 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 96 | 74% |
| Scientists | 27 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Estonia | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 25 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 31% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 24% |
| Unknown | 3 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 21% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 21% |
| Psychology | 4 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 119. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2016.
All research outputs
#354,182
of 25,619,480 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#18,289
of 98,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,362
of 315,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#424
of 992 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,619,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,369 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 992 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.