Title |
Google’s lung cancer AI: a promising tool that needs further validation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, June 2019
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41571-019-0248-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Colin Jacobs, Bram van Ginneken |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 12% |
Ecuador | 6 | 12% |
Netherlands | 5 | 10% |
Comoros | 2 | 4% |
Japan | 2 | 4% |
Spain | 2 | 4% |
Canada | 2 | 4% |
Finland | 1 | 2% |
Argentina | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Unknown | 18 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 26 | 52% |
Scientists | 18 | 36% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 15% |
Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 3% |
Professor | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 30 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 12 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 10% |
Computer Science | 5 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 37 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2020.
All research outputs
#675,821
of 25,200,621 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
#156
of 2,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,494
of 357,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
#6
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,200,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.