↓ Skip to main content

Skin infection generates non-migratory memory CD8+ TRM cells providing global skin immunity

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
patent
3 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
717 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
705 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Skin infection generates non-migratory memory CD8+ TRM cells providing global skin immunity
Published in
Nature, February 2012
DOI 10.1038/nature10851
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaodong Jiang, Rachael A. Clark, Luzheng Liu, Amy J. Wagers, Robert C. Fuhlbrigge, Thomas S. Kupper

Abstract

Protective T-cell memory has long been thought to reside in blood and lymph nodes, but recently the concept of immune memory in peripheral tissues mediated by resident memory T (T(RM)) cells has been proposed. Here we show in mice that localized vaccinia virus (VACV) skin infection generates long-lived non-recirculating CD8(+) skin T(RM) cells that reside within the entire skin. These skin T(RM) cells are potent effector cells, and are superior to circulating central memory T (T(CM)) cells at providing rapid long-term protection against cutaneous re-infection. We find that CD8(+) T cells are rapidly recruited to skin after acute VACV infection. CD8(+) T-cell recruitment to skin is independent of CD4(+) T cells and interferon-γ, but requires the expression of E- and P-selectin ligands by CD8(+) T cells. Using parabiotic mice, we further show that circulating CD8(+) T(CM) and CD8(+) skin T(RM) cells are both generated after skin infection; however, CD8(+) T(CM) cells recirculate between blood and lymph nodes whereas T(RM) cells remain in the skin. Cutaneous CD8(+) T(RM) cells produce effector cytokines and persist for at least 6 months after infection. Mice with CD8(+) skin T(RM) cells rapidly cleared a subsequent re-infection with VACV whereas mice with circulating T(CM) but no skin T(RM) cells showed greatly impaired viral clearance, indicating that T(RM) cells provide superior protection. Finally, we show that T(RM) cells generated as a result of localized VACV skin infection reside not only in the site of infection, but also populate the entire skin surface and remain present for many months. Repeated re-infections lead to progressive accumulation of highly protective T(RM) cells in non-involved skin. These findings have important implications for our understanding of protective immune memory at epithelial interfaces with the environment, and suggest novel strategies for vaccines that protect against tissue tropic organisms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 705 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 2%
Japan 5 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 9 1%
Unknown 668 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 185 26%
Researcher 160 23%
Student > Master 66 9%
Student > Bachelor 55 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 44 6%
Other 101 14%
Unknown 94 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 233 33%
Immunology and Microbiology 166 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 109 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 48 7%
Chemistry 9 1%
Other 33 5%
Unknown 107 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,669,120
of 23,390,392 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#38,478
of 92,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,497
of 156,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#557
of 1,038 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,390,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 92,207 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 100.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,038 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.