↓ Skip to main content

One step closer to understanding the role of bacteria in diabetic foot ulcers: characterising the microbiome of ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Microbiology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
Title
One step closer to understanding the role of bacteria in diabetic foot ulcers: characterising the microbiome of ulcers
Published in
BMC Microbiology, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12866-016-0665-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen Smith, Andrew Collier, Eleanor M. Townsend, Lindsay E. O’Donnell, Abhijit M. Bal, John Butcher, William G. Mackay, Gordon Ramage, Craig Williams

Abstract

The aim of this study was to characterise the microbiome of new and recurrent diabetic foot ulcers using 16S amplicon sequencing (16S AS), allowing the identification of a wider range of bacterial species that may be important in the development of chronicity in these debilitating wounds. Twenty patients not receiving antibiotics for the past three months were selected, with swabs taken from each individual for culture and 16S AS. DNA was isolated using a combination of bead beating and kit extraction. Samples were sequenced on the Illumina Hiseq 2500 platform. Conventional laboratory culture showed positive growth from only 55 % of the patients, whereas 16S AS was positive for 75 % of the patients (41 unique genera, representing 82 different operational taxonomic units (OTU's). S. aureus was isolated in 72 % of culture-positive samples, whereas the most commonly detected bacteria in all ulcers were Peptoniphilus spp., Anaerococcus spp. and Corynebacterium spp., with the addition of Staphylococcus spp. in new ulcers. The majority of OTU's residing in both new and recurrent ulcers (over 67 %) were identified as facultative or strict anaerobic Gram-positive organisms. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed no difference in clustering between the two groups (new and recurrent ulcers). The abundance of anaerobic bacteria has important implications for treatment as it suggests that the microbiome of each ulcer "starts afresh" and that, although diverse, are not distinctly different from one another with respect to new or recurrent ulcers. Therefore, when considering antibiotic therapy the duration of current ulceration may be a more important consideration than a history of healed ulcer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 226 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 11%
Student > Master 26 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Researcher 18 8%
Student > Postgraduate 15 7%
Other 58 26%
Unknown 65 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 36 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 7%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 69 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2016.
All research outputs
#3,304,964
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#273
of 3,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,032
of 306,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#5
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,434 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.