| Title |
Live imaging of Aiptasia larvae, a model system for coral and anemone bleaching, using a simple microfluidic device
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-45167-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Will Van Treuren, Kara K. Brower, Louai Labanieh, Daniel Hunt, Sarah Lensch, Bianca Cruz, Heather N. Cartwright, Cawa Tran, Polly M. Fordyce |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 27% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 55% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 25 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 28 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,602,797
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#35,525
of 127,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,142
of 352,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#984
of 3,258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 127,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.