| Title |
Impact of weekly case-based tele-education on quality of care in a limited resource medical intensive care unit
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-019-2494-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pedja Kovacevic, Sasa Dragic, Tijana Kovacevic, Danica Momcicevic, Emir Festic, Rahul Kashyap, Alexander S. Niven, Yue Dong, Ognjen Gajic |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 256 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 54 | 21% |
| United States | 24 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 1% |
| Austria | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Argentina | 2 | <1% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 156 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 234 | 91% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 4% |
| Scientists | 9 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 222 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 11% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 41 | 18% |
| Unknown | 89 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 3% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 13% |
| Unknown | 105 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 189. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2023.
All research outputs
#215,101
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#94
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,222
of 369,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#2
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.