| Title |
Lower Incidence Rate of Type 1 Diabetes after Receipt of the Rotavirus Vaccine in the United States, 2001–2017
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-44193-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mary A. M. Rogers, Tanima Basu, Catherine Kim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 302 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 37 | 12% |
| Spain | 33 | 11% |
| Japan | 14 | 5% |
| Canada | 11 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 3% |
| France | 7 | 2% |
| Australia | 6 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 1% |
| India | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 26 | 9% |
| Unknown | 150 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 245 | 81% |
| Scientists | 29 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 23 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 19% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 19% |
| Unknown | 26 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 27% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 33 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 449. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#62,953
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#885
of 142,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,171
of 369,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#28
of 3,266 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,266 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.