| Title |
Do health professionals value genomic testing? A discrete choice experiment in inherited cardiovascular disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Human Genetics, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41431-019-0452-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James Buchanan, Edward Blair, Kate L. Thomson, Elizabeth Ormondroyd, Hugh Watkins, Jenny C. Taylor, Sarah Wordsworth |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 31% |
| Australia | 4 | 15% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| Canada | 2 | 8% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 4% |
| Singapore | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 46% |
| Scientists | 10 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 17 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 16% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Energy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 17 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,169,499
of 24,597,084 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Human Genetics
#438
of 3,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,225
of 358,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Human Genetics
#11
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,597,084 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,594 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.