↓ Skip to main content

High-efficiency, large-area, topology-optimized metasurfaces

Overview of attention for article published in Light: Science & Applications, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
High-efficiency, large-area, topology-optimized metasurfaces
Published in
Light: Science & Applications, May 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41377-019-0159-5
Authors

Thaibao Phan, David Sell, Evan W. Wang, Sage Doshay, Kofi Edee, Jianji Yang, Jonathan A. Fan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 44%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Student > Master 4 5%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 11 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 31 37%
Engineering 27 32%
Materials Science 5 6%
Chemistry 1 1%
Unknown 20 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2019.
All research outputs
#8,708,339
of 15,184,339 outputs
Outputs from Light: Science & Applications
#444
of 674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,553
of 264,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Light: Science & Applications
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,184,339 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them