| Title |
Development of an immunodeficient pig model allowing long-term accommodation of artificial human vascular tubes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-10107-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Manabu Itoh, Yosuke Mukae, Takahiro Kitsuka, Kenichi Arai, Anna Nakamura, Kazuyoshi Uchihashi, Shuji Toda, Kumika Matsubayashi, Jun-ichi Oyama, Koichi Node, Daisuke Kami, Satoshi Gojo, Shigeki Morita, Takahiro Nishida, Koichi Nakayama, Eiji Kobayashi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 19% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 20 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 22% |
| Engineering | 10 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 21 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,759,177
of 25,634,695 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#24,267
of 57,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,678
of 365,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#588
of 1,342 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,634,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,342 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.