| Title |
Direct imaging of the circular chromosome in a live bacterium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-10221-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fabai Wu, Aleksandre Japaridze, Xuan Zheng, Jakub Wiktor, Jacob W. J. Kerssemakers, Cees Dekker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 148 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 30 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 17 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 15 | 10% |
| Germany | 5 | 3% |
| France | 5 | 3% |
| India | 4 | 3% |
| Australia | 4 | 3% |
| Sweden | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 52 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 83 | 56% |
| Members of the public | 60 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 121 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 27% |
| Researcher | 21 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 23 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 37 | 31% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 19 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 13% |
| Engineering | 7 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 28 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 98. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2023.
All research outputs
#440,935
of 25,755,403 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#7,317
of 58,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,364
of 366,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#158
of 1,356 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,755,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,356 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.