| Title |
Single trial prestimulus oscillations predict perception of the sound-induced flash illusion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-42380-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mathis Kaiser, Daniel Senkowski, Niko A. Busch, Johanna Balz, Julian Keil |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| Ireland | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 45% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 18% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 19 | 28% |
| Neuroscience | 18 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,749,573
of 23,142,049 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#36,691
of 125,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,013
of 352,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,264
of 3,858 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,142,049 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,858 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.