| Title |
Molecular evolutionary trends and feeding ecology diversification in the Hemiptera, anchored by the milkweed bug genome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-019-1660-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristen A. Panfilio, Iris M. Vargas Jentzsch, Joshua B. Benoit, Deniz Erezyilmaz, Yuichiro Suzuki, Stefano Colella, Hugh M. Robertson, Monica F. Poelchau, Robert M. Waterhouse, Panagiotis Ioannidis, Matthew T. Weirauch, Daniel S. T. Hughes, Shwetha C. Murali, John H. Werren, Chris G. C. Jacobs, Elizabeth J. Duncan, David Armisén, Barbara M. I. Vreede, Patrice Baa-Puyoulet, Chloé S. Berger, Chun-che Chang, Hsu Chao, Mei-Ju M. Chen, Yen-Ta Chen, Christopher P. Childers, Ariel D. Chipman, Andrew G. Cridge, Antonin J. J. Crumière, Peter K. Dearden, Elise M. Didion, Huyen Dinh, Harsha Vardhan Doddapaneni, Amanda Dolan, Shannon Dugan, Cassandra G. Extavour, Gérard Febvay, Markus Friedrich, Neta Ginzburg, Yi Han, Peter Heger, Christopher J. Holmes, Thorsten Horn, Yi-min Hsiao, Emily C. Jennings, J. Spencer Johnston, Tamsin E. Jones, Jeffery W. Jones, Abderrahman Khila, Stefan Koelzer, Viera Kovacova, Megan Leask, Sandra L. Lee, Chien-Yueh Lee, Mackenzie R. Lovegrove, Hsiao-ling Lu, Yong Lu, Patricia J. Moore, Monica C. Munoz-Torres, Donna M. Muzny, Subba R. Palli, Nicolas Parisot, Leslie Pick, Megan L. Porter, Jiaxin Qu, Peter N. Refki, Rose Richter, Rolando Rivera-Pomar, Andrew J. Rosendale, Siegfried Roth, Lena Sachs, M. Emília Santos, Jan Seibert, Essia Sghaier, Jayendra N. Shukla, Richard J. Stancliffe, Olivia Tidswell, Lucila Traverso, Maurijn van der Zee, Séverine Viala, Kim C. Worley, Evgeny M. Zdobnov, Richard A. Gibbs, Stephen Richards |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 13% |
| Argentina | 3 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 55% |
| Scientists | 13 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 154 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 19% |
| Researcher | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Unknown | 41 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 63 | 41% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 21% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 1% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 47 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2019.
All research outputs
#654,741
of 25,893,933 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#399
of 4,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,694
of 366,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#15
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,893,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.