↓ Skip to main content

Reproductive and genetic consequences of founding isolated lion populations

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, September 1987
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
309 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
259 Mendeley
Title
Reproductive and genetic consequences of founding isolated lion populations
Published in
Nature, September 1987
DOI 10.1038/329328a0
Authors

D. E. Wildt, M. Bush, K. L. Goodrowe, C. Packer, A. E. Pusey, J. L. Brown, P. Joslin, S. J. O'Brien

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 4 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Brazil 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Czechia 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 236 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 49 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 19%
Student > Master 42 16%
Student > Bachelor 31 12%
Other 18 7%
Other 46 18%
Unknown 25 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 156 60%
Environmental Science 41 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 2%
Other 9 3%
Unknown 32 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,109,316
of 23,414,653 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#32,641
of 92,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110
of 12,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#5
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,414,653 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 92,286 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 100.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.