| Title |
Glacier ablation and temperature indexed melt models in the Nepalese Himalaya
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-41657-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maxime Litt, Joseph Shea, Patrick Wagnon, Jakob Steiner, Inka Koch, Emmy Stigter, Walter Immerzeel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 17% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Belgium | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 83% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 26% |
| Researcher | 16 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 23 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 36 | 42% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 8% |
| Engineering | 5 | 6% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 31 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2019.
All research outputs
#4,221,951
of 23,576,969 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#33,154
of 127,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,469
of 352,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,227
of 4,132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,576,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 127,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.