| Title |
Widespread losses of pollinating insects in Britain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-08974-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gary D. Powney, Claire Carvell, Mike Edwards, Roger K. A. Morris, Helen E. Roy, Ben A. Woodcock, Nick J. B. Isaac |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 726 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 236 | 33% |
| United States | 41 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 27 | 4% |
| Germany | 26 | 4% |
| France | 13 | 2% |
| Canada | 12 | 2% |
| Spain | 12 | 2% |
| Belgium | 9 | 1% |
| Ireland | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 63 | 9% |
| Unknown | 279 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 559 | 77% |
| Scientists | 126 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 27 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 920 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 920 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 152 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 136 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 132 | 14% |
| Researcher | 119 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 3% |
| Other | 93 | 10% |
| Unknown | 259 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 349 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 142 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 34 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 18 | 2% |
| Engineering | 8 | <1% |
| Other | 65 | 7% |
| Unknown | 304 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1046. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2024.
All research outputs
#15,306
of 25,756,531 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#296
of 58,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290
of 365,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#2
of 1,352 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,352 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.