| Title |
Site-selective and versatile aromatic C−H functionalization by thianthrenation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-019-0982-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Florian Berger, Matthew B. Plutschack, Julian Riegger, Wanwan Yu, Samira Speicher, Matthew Ho, Nils Frank, Tobias Ritter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 92 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 8% |
| Germany | 7 | 8% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| India | 3 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 43 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 45 | 49% |
| Members of the public | 43 | 47% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 354 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 354 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 79 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 48 | 14% |
| Researcher | 43 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 39 | 11% |
| Unknown | 94 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 220 | 62% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 4% |
| Unknown | 103 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2020.
All research outputs
#574,702
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#24,382
of 97,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,272
of 365,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#554
of 1,041 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97,858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,041 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.