| Title |
A Hox-TALE regulatory circuit for neural crest patterning is conserved across vertebrates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-09197-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hugo J. Parker, Bony De Kumar, Stephen A. Green, Karin D. Prummel, Christopher Hess, Charles K. Kaufman, Christian Mosimann, Leanne M. Wiedemann, Marianne E. Bronner, Robb Krumlauf |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| France | 3 | 7% |
| Germany | 3 | 7% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Norway | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 15 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 25 | 61% |
| Members of the public | 13 | 32% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 23% |
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 18 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 20 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,716,443
of 25,376,589 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#23,710
of 56,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,142
of 358,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#649
of 1,403 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,376,589 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 56,637 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,403 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.