| Title |
A multiplexable assay for screening antibiotic lethality against drug-tolerant bacteria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41592-019-0333-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan M. Stokes, Arnaud Gutierrez, Allison J. Lopatkin, Ian W. Andrews, Shawn French, Ivan Matic, Eric D. Brown, James J. Collins |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 47% |
| Canada | 5 | 15% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Russia | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 56% |
| Scientists | 14 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 132 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 23% |
| Researcher | 23 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Unknown | 30 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 37 | 28% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 17 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 12% |
| Engineering | 12 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 30 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,956,067
of 25,859,234 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#2,175
of 5,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,308
of 367,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#39
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,859,234 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.