| Title |
Signs of biological activities of 28,000-year-old mammoth nuclei in mouse oocytes visualized by live-cell imaging
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-40546-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kazuo Yamagata, Kouhei Nagai, Hiroshi Miyamoto, Masayuki Anzai, Hiromi Kato, Kei Miyamoto, Satoshi Kurosaka, Rika Azuma, Igor I. Kolodeznikov, Albert V. Protopopov, Valerii V. Plotnikov, Hisato Kobayashi, Ryouka Kawahara-Miki, Tomohiro Kono, Masao Uchida, Yasuyuki Shibata, Tetsuya Handa, Hiroshi Kimura, Yoshihiko Hosoi, Tasuku Mitani, Kazuya Matsumoto, Akira Iritani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,646 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 249 | 9% |
| Spain | 162 | 6% |
| Japan | 123 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 117 | 4% |
| France | 90 | 3% |
| Mexico | 89 | 3% |
| Chile | 53 | 2% |
| Argentina | 51 | 2% |
| Canada | 40 | 2% |
| Other | 432 | 16% |
| Unknown | 1240 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2235 | 84% |
| Scientists | 319 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 58 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 33 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 106 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 24 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 32 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2627. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,859
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#37
of 142,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47
of 366,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#3
of 4,352 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,352 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.