| Title |
A Haemophilus sp. dominates the microbiota of sputum from UK adults with non-severe community acquired pneumonia and chronic lung disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-018-38090-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel G. Wootton, Michael J. Cox, Gregory B. Gloor, David Litt, Katja Hoschler, Esther German, Joanne Court, Odiri Eneje, Lynne Keogan, Laura Macfarlane, Sarah Wilks, Peter J. Diggle, Mark Woodhead, Miriam F. Moffatt, William O. C. Cookson, Stephen B. Gordon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 38% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 17% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 16 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,480,176
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#21,695
of 127,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,628
of 354,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#874
of 4,301 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 127,567 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,301 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.