| Title |
De novo origins of multicellularity in response to predation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-39558-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew D. Herron, Joshua M. Borin, Jacob C. Boswell, Jillian Walker, I-Chen Kimberly Chen, Charles A. Knox, Margrethe Boyd, Frank Rosenzweig, William C. Ratcliff |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4,104 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 646 | 16% |
| Spain | 231 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 228 | 6% |
| Canada | 100 | 2% |
| France | 82 | 2% |
| Australia | 68 | 2% |
| India | 68 | 2% |
| Germany | 60 | 1% |
| Brazil | 60 | 1% |
| Other | 512 | 12% |
| Unknown | 2049 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3305 | 81% |
| Scientists | 680 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 58 | 1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 54 | 1% |
| Unknown | 7 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 372 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 372 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 84 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 56 | 15% |
| Researcher | 54 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 50 | 13% |
| Other | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 13% |
| Unknown | 64 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 122 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 78 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 20 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 13 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 52 | 14% |
| Unknown | 78 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1253. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#11,093
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#184
of 142,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193
of 368,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#7
of 4,315 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,315 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.